Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:Src UML/Best way to link this page/reply (2)"
Floquation (Talk | contribs) (Reply to Best way to link this page) |
Floquation (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I purposely made this a subpage ("OpenFOAM guide/UML/lagrangian"), since a future page "OpenFOAM guide/lagrangian" is not hard to imagine, whilst it will serve a different purpose. | I purposely made this a subpage ("OpenFOAM guide/UML/lagrangian"), since a future page "OpenFOAM guide/lagrangian" is not hard to imagine, whilst it will serve a different purpose. | ||
Linking it via a subpage (for the unicity in name) AND a category seems verbose to me. | Linking it via a subpage (for the unicity in name) AND a category seems verbose to me. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, subpaging + categorizing (as is currently done for all "OpenFOAM guide/..." pages), has the problem that everything is categorized underneath the "O", which takes away a large part of the purpose of categorization. | ||
Opinions? | Opinions? | ||
Latest revision as of 15:37, 1 December 2014
I have moved the page to "OpenFOAM guide" in the new category "OpenFOAM source code documentation". This new category should be sufficiently broad to cover a wide range of (future) pages, but still specific enough as to only attract readers which are actually looking for this information.
Currently, the subpage "lagrangian" is a subpage of a parent page UML, and not linked via a category (as I understand is the convention?). I purposely made this a subpage ("OpenFOAM guide/UML/lagrangian"), since a future page "OpenFOAM guide/lagrangian" is not hard to imagine, whilst it will serve a different purpose. Linking it via a subpage (for the unicity in name) AND a category seems verbose to me.
Also, subpaging + categorizing (as is currently done for all "OpenFOAM guide/..." pages), has the problem that everything is categorized underneath the "O", which takes away a large part of the purpose of categorization.
Opinions?
